Płyty pokryte są jednostronnie welonem z włókna szklanego w kolorze czarnym, co podnosi walory akustyczne płyt. You could create reference planes drawn at an angle and make sweeps or extrusions on those planes for the hooks, plus half a dozen other methods that might also be more accurate, but I personally wouldn't bother.Płyty z wełny skalnej TECHROCK 60 FB1 przeznaczone do izolacji kanałów wentylacyjnych na powierzchniach wewnętrznych. (Sometimes creating a solid block as a 'scaffold' to model on top of can be helpful, and the solid block is then set to never be visible.)Īll that said, the actual hook: I would keep it simple and create the curved hook shape as an extrusion in elevation, then a void extrusion from plan to achieve the angled shape, then join it with the top piece: You can draw reference planes to create forms on (as long as you give the reference plane a name), or you can use flat surfaces of existing geometry as the planes. You're almost always locked to a specific plane for each individual element and achieving more complex shapes involves building forms on one plane, and then adding/cutting away from another plane. In any case, Revit modelling in comparison with other software isn't nearly as organic and is quite plane based.

Not to mention edge display issues (Revit can have a hard time displaying the 'edge' of a curved surface from certain viewing angles) you might to need to reconsider - you're going to be constantly fighting with non-tangent joins between geometry/surfaces and it's a fight so stacked against you that it's not worth the time. If you're trying to achieve perfectly smooth shapes, no hard edges, etc. A lot of people would simply leave it as a cube - in terms of all the information and modelling that needs to be included in a full construction set of documentation, showing the hooks of a coat hook is almost irrelevant.

How precise are you expecting it to be? How you model it in Revit really depends on how much you're willing to simplify it.

Linking revit models